So I've done it again.
There is no logic at all. First I cancel all conferences and guest
lectures, then I accept another invitation. My motivation for
cancelling old commitments or declining new ones is that travel is
becoming too demanding. In which case, why did I accept an invitation
to a day-and-a-half conference, sandwiched between two days of
extremely long and stressful travel?
An obvious reason: I
expected it to be a very interesting event, because it is a workshop
rather than conference, with seven speakers, pre-circulated papers,
discussants and plenty of time for general discussion. Expectations
confirmed. It was a very interesting and gratifying event, in which I
learned a lot, shared a lot, and received great feedback on my own
work from colleagues who don't know me nor my work, who all come from
different disciplines, and who had no prejudices against children's
literature since they didn't know anything about it. But I have a
feeling that they got interested, made the necessary connections with
their own research, and definitely will consider reading a least one
young adult novel.
A less obvious reason: one
of the speakers is extensively referred to in my current research. He
spoke about something completely different (and highly engaging), but
his questions and comments on my paper showed that he at the very
least understood what I was talking about. Actually, since the papers
were pre-circulated, I didn't even talk from the paper, but set it
into a wider context. All professional gatherings should be like
that.
Reminder to myself: yes,
it is increasinly more difficult to travel, unless it is a direct
flight from Stansted of no longer than two hours. I had investigated
all travel options, and I couldn't have won anything through flying
from Stansted since the other end would have been awful. It was awful
enough. You may think that 12.40 is a very civilised flight that does
not require getting up before dawn. But see, it takes me almost
three hours to get to Heathrow plus you must be there at least an
hour in advance, preferably earlier for security check. Then a
relatively short flight to Madrid, four hours until next flight,
which was only 45 minutes. A good angel in the form of a
shuttle-service driver. It was by then well over nine, and I was
fully determined to go to bed right away, but when the host spotted
me in the hotel reception and invited me to join the other
participants for dinner (those late Spanish dinners!) of course I
could not resist.
Then a day-and-a-half of
exceptionally stimulating scholarly exchange, interrupted by long and
plentiful meals. Then yesterday, a quick walk to the old city centre,
mostly to be able to say: Yes. I have been to Pamplona. An expected
bonus was an exhibit in the Cathedral. By then, however, it was plus
four and raining, and I knew that I would have to make an early start
in the morning. So rather than accepting (as I surely would have done
ten years ago) the fellow participant idea of a cup of tea or a glass
of wine, I withdrew and actually went to bed early. Really early if
you consider the changing of the clock. It took me some time – and
a few consultations on Facebook – to figure out the correct setting
for my two alarms (phone and paddy), and to be on the safe side I
also ordered a wake-up call. 4.30 in the morning is not a civilised
time to travel, but I really had no choice. The worst thing was that
I had no time to get coffee before I was on the second
flight. Everything
was pretty uneventful until I got to King's Cross. I had looked up
the train timetable on my phone while I was heading East on Picadilly
line, but there was something profoundly wrong with it because it
kept telling me that the itinerary King's Cross to Cambridge was not
available. I ascibed it to my tiredness and gave up after five
attempts. But when I emerged from the Tube at King's Cross, my
itinerary was unavailable. Which is not funny when you have
been travelling since very early morning. I stared at the display
trying to figure out a reasonable solution when I happened to realise
that I had Information right behind my back With some good
advice, I took a train as far as it would take me, and then there was
a replacement bus. (A definition by a friend: "A bus that pretends to be a train"). It only delayed me with an hour, and I saw some
pretty countryside.
Summary: is
it worthwhile.. etc? Professionally, yes, and if I were sure that all
events I go to would be so fruitful, perhaps I should start
travelling more again. Yet the travel itself is exhausting. Maybe if
I learn Apparition.
Footnote: paddy has proved indispensable. I had all the papers on it, including my own,
and I had several Kindle books. It is, I must underline, more
pleasurable to read on Kindle than on paddy; the latter has a shiny
screen and reflections. For checking email and social sites, paddy
was perfect, but if I had wished to write something (such as a blog
post), the keyboard is too small. But perhaps I will learn. For short travel, paddy easily replaces the combination of Kindle and
laptop. So at least as the proof of the pudding, the experience was
useful.
No comments:
Post a Comment